Get Case Studies in Infrastructure Delivery PDF

By John B. Miller

ISBN-10: 1461353068

ISBN-13: 9781461353065

ISBN-10: 1461509238

ISBN-13: 9781461509233

BACKGROUND OF THE venture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sixteen FINANCING THE undertaking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 supply OF THE DULLES GREENWAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 working effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 QUESTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 CONCLUDING NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 bankruptcy three overseas ARRIVALS development AT JOHN F. KENNEDY foreign AIRPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 INFRASTRUCTURE improvement structures IDS-98-I-201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 heritage OF the loo F. KENNEDY overseas AIRPORT . . . . . . . . . . 34 past PLANS FOR overseas ARRIVALS development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 historical past OF THE PORT AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 NEW PLANS FOR foreign ARRIVALS development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 TERMINAL ONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . three 7 FEASIBILITY research OF THE lAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 initial layout -1993 TO 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forty THE PRE-QUALIFICATION AND BIDDING approach - 1995 TO 1997 . . . . . . forty-one long island LAND hire challenge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forty five CONSORTIUM contributors _ JFK foreign AIR TERMINAL LLC forty five THE AMSTERDAM AIRPORT version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forty six FINANCING procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forty seven last THE DEAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forty eight QUESTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forty nine bankruptcy four THE SR ninety one show LANES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty three INFRASTRUCTURE improvement platforms IDS-97-T-012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty three the matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty three Key good points of AB 680 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty four THE historical past of non-public TOLL ROADS within the usa . . . . . . . . fifty five CAL TRANS' PRE-QUALIFICATION procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty six the decision FOR aggressive CONCEPTUAL PROPOSALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty seven THE PROPOSALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty eight short heritage OF SR ninety one . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fifty nine KEY gains OF THE PROPOSED SR ninety one TOLL limited-access highway . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Consortium individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 VB Contents THE PROPOSED improvement FRANCHISE contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sixty one FINANCING package deal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sixty three MATT MOORE'S projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sixty three QUESTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sixty seven REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sixty nine NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 CHAPTERS SANTA ANA VIADUCT exhibit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . seventy one INFRASTRUCTURE improvement structures IDS-97 -T -011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . seventy one the matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . seventy one Salient gains of AB 680 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . seventy two CALTRANS' PRE-QUALIFICATION technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Show description

Read Online or Download Case Studies in Infrastructure Delivery PDF

Similar environmental engineering books

Environmental Engineering Water Wastewater Soil and by Nelson L. Nemerow, Franklin J. Agardy, Joseph A. Salvato PDF

First released in 1958, Salvato's Environmental Engineering has lengthy been the definitive reference for generations of sanitation and environmental engineers. impending its 50th 12 months of continuous book in a swiftly altering box, the 6th version has been totally remodeled and reorganized into 3 separate, succinct volumes to evolve to a extra complicated and scientifically challenging box with dozens of specializations.

Estimating Abundance of African Wildlife: An Aid to Adaptive by Hugo Jachmann PDF

Estimating abundance of flora and fauna is a vital part of a flora and fauna learn application, and a prerequisite for sound administration. aside from a couple of hugely mathematical volumes, there aren't any books at the topic to be used by way of scholars and box staff. additionally, a few of the recommendations for counting animals present in clinical journals are usually now not obtainable to African managers.

Get Revising Green Infrastructure: Concepts Between Nature and PDF

''This e-book addresses the topic of ''green infrastructure'' from the point of view of panorama structure. It brings jointly the paintings of chosen ecologists, engineers, and panorama architects who talk about numerous theoretical elements, examine tasks, educating equipment, and most sensible perform examples in eco-friendly infrastructure''--

Download e-book for kindle: Green Organic Chemistry and its Interdisciplinary by Vera M. Kolb

Eco-friendly natural Chemistry and Its Interdisciplinary functions covers key advancements in eco-friendly chemistry and demonstrates to scholars that the advancements have been in general the results of cutting edge considering. utilizing a collection of chosen experiments, all of which were played within the laboratory with undergraduate scholars, it demonstrates tips on how to optimize and boost eco-friendly experiments.

Extra info for Case Studies in Infrastructure Delivery

Example text

Should the banks stick with the project for the long haul? Sell part of this long-term risk at a discount? Get out entirely? Was the decision to fund this project sensible in the first place? John retrieved his files on the project, including his closing binder from the financial transaction, and many news articles that had appeared in the local press before, during, and after delivery of the facility. Background of the Project The Dulles Greenway is an extension of the existing Dulles Toll Road from the entrance to Dulles International Airport west for approximately 14 miles to the junction of Routes 7 and 15 near Leesburg, Virginia.

Supp 8. The District won the case at the trial level and an appeal was withdrawn in 1932. This seemed to be the last legal hurdle left to issue the bonds and construct the bridge. But another difficulty arose as steps were begun to let the contracts and to begin construction. 75% bonds that were to be sold by the District to finance the bridge. The District's authorizing statute allowed only a 5% interest rate on the bonds. 25%. Bond attorneys from New York, retained by the District, thought that the Bankamerica offer, if accepted, would make the bonds illegal.

A delay in construction completion of 2 years (at the same total cost). d. An increase in the total construction price of 10% (allotted in the same proportions as your base case from Question 1). e. A 25% increase in the planned toll rates. f. A 50% increase in the planned toll rates. 3. Answer the Following Questions. a. What was the project delivery method for the Golden Gate Bridge? Did the Counties "outsource" the project's cash flow (sources and uses) to an independent entity? Why? Is the Authority a public entity?

Download PDF sample

Case Studies in Infrastructure Delivery by John B. Miller


by George
4.2

Rated 4.02 of 5 – based on 34 votes